Annual Conference

Recent Comments

  • carmen blum on Answering the Perplexities of Parent Involvement
  • Brenda Smith Myles on Overcoming the Fear of Blogs: Teaching Critical Skills, Learning About Your Learners
  • Barry Wansbrough on Student Retention Closes Gaps
  • Patricia Bigby on What Attendees Had to Say, Part 1
  • Patricia Bigby on What Attendees Had to Say, Part 1
  • Carolyn Pool on Student Retention Closes Gaps
  • Corinne Garner on Overcoming the Fear of Blogs: Teaching Critical Skills, Learning About Your Learners
  • Joe Hung on E-Communication: Boosting Parental Involvement
  • Russell Eisenman on Session Canceled
  • John Tibbetts on Student Retention Closes Gaps

Recent Posts

  • Student Retention Closes Gaps
  • Overcoming the Fear of Blogs: Teaching Critical Skills, Learning About Your Learners
  • A Generation to Define a Century
  • Schools Respond to Student Protests
  • The Big Benefits of Books
  • Musical Interludes
  • Curriculum Mapping on the Edge
  • Blogs in the Classroom, About the Classroom
  • Using Jazz to Lead Students into New Frontiers of Understanding
  • What Attendees Had to Say, Part 3

Categories

  • Announcements
  • Assessment and Evaluation
  • Books
  • Character Education
  • Collaborations and Partnerships
  • Core Curriculum Subjects
  • Current Affairs
  • Curriculum Instruction
  • Diversity in Education
  • Education Research
  • Fine Arts
  • Instructional Technology
  • Music
  • My Kind of Town
  • Planning and Leadership
  • Professional Development
  • Program Changes
  • School Restructuring and Reform
  • Science
  • Seen and Heard
  • Web/Tech
  • Weblogs
  • Worldwide Issues

Archives

  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006

A Generation to Define a Century

"There is a mysterious cycle in human events. To some generations much is given.  Of other generations much is expected. This generation of Americans has a rendezvous with destiny."

Historian, economist, demographer, and author Neil Howe uses that 1936 quote by Franklin D. Roosevelt to sum up the expectations and potential of the kids who currently populate our classrooms. His ASCD Annual Conference General Session presentation offered perspectives on the educational implications of teaching a generation of students he calls “the Millennials.”

The first Millennials were born in 1982, he said, and graduated high school with the Class of 2000. “Remember “Baby On Board” stickers on minivans?” Howe asked. These are those babies, growing up now in a high-pressure world and thriving in ways that seem alien to their Baby Boomer and Generation X parents—and teachers.

“They don’t mind the pressure,” Howe said, “as long as they feel like they’re getting somewhere.” Educators can help Millennials by recognizing that these boys and girls have unique characteristics. Know them and you’ll know Millennials.

“Seven core traits mark this generation as different from Boomers and X-ers,” Howe said. “This generation is special, sheltered, confident, team oriented, conventional, pressured, and achieving. All of this has implications for school reform and school curriculum.”

Because Millennials consider themselves special, educators should:

  • Encourage parental involvement. “Get the helicopter moms on your side,” Howe joked.
  • Ask the public and media to support efforts to improve education. They want to.

Millennials are sheltered – they are used to being watched over, and expect it. That means educators should:

  • Emphasize school safety and accountability.
  • Take a fresh look at class and school sizes. Smaller will be perceived as better at providing “structured communities that let no one fall through the cracks,” Howe said.

Since Millennials are confident, they are “collectively optimistic about their economic prospects. The new idea is that every child is college ready, not just job-ready,” he noted. Educators should:

  • Stress positive outcomes for everyone.
  • Use contextual and project-based environments.
  • Craft personal progress plans to guide students’ learning and growth.

Millennials’ are team orientation may be their most notable quality. “They like groups, they like applying their energy to community projects,” Howe said. “They use technology to plug into the group, through instant messaging and user groups and e-mail.” To tap that collective goodwill:

  • Teach team skills.
  • Build community service into the curriculum.
  • Provide opportunities for students to help other students.

Millennials have relatively conventional hopes and dreams. “They define their life goals in terms of career, work-life balance, citizenship,” Howe said. “They plan ahead. And they trust big institutions in ways that Boomers haven’t.” For educators, this characteristic invites a back-to-basics approach:

  • Create core curricula that every student is expected to master. “Make sure that every task is achievable with directed effort,” he said.
  • Celebrate progress.
  • Continuously monitor, assess, and redirect learning. “The best schools for Millennials instantly detect—day to day—the progress of every student,” Howe said.

Millennials are pressured. Structured activities fill most hours in their days, but they generally respond well to pressure. To take advantage of that skill while minimizing burn-out, educators can:

  • “Stress long-term life planning and guarantees over short-term opportunities and risks,” Howe advised. Forget learning from mistakes; “Millennials don’t want to make any mistakes,” he said.
  • Structure learning around goal mastery.
  • Reverse engineer curricula, starting with where you want students to be at the end of the year. “A sense of destination is what Millennials want in their curriculum,” Howe said.

Millennials are achieving; they embrace educational challenge and want higher standards. Three-quarters say they want to attend four-year colleges. Acknowledging that penchant for high achievement, educators should:

  • Build challenging curricula.
  • Emphasize achievement over aptitude and effort.
  • Incorporate cutting-edge computer technology into the curriculum.
  • “Finally, encourage teachers to set an example themselves of professional achievement and lifelong learning,” Howe said.

“This generation is going to define the 21st Century much like the G.I. Generation defined the 20th Century,” Howe said, recalling the cohort that weathered the Great Depression and won World War II. “They are going to face many burdens as they grow older: geopolitical, environmental, fiscal, economic. When you look at this generation—protected, team-playing, confident, collectively optimistic—you see some of the traits that we saw in their grandparents.”

Posted by ASCD Bloggers on April 20, 2006 at 03:57 PM in Character Education, Collaborations and Partnerships, Core Curriculum Subjects, Curriculum Instruction, School Restructuring and Reform, Worldwide Issues | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

ASCD’s Whole Child Commitment: Reframing Education

ASCD is starting to shift the dialogue from schooling to learning—and in doing so, reframing the definition of education, observed ASCD Executive Director Gene Carter during Sunday’s ASCD Annual Meeting. Carter and ASCD President Mary Ellen Freeley reported on the state of the Association during the annual convening of leaders and members.

Annual20meeting20231

Freeley opened the meeting by highlighting the work of the ASCD Board of Directors during 2005-2006, activities that included strengthening the Leadership Council and its influence, participating in ASCD’s first Leadership for Effective Advocacy and Practice Institute, and refining the nominations process.

“It has been a wonderful year, a productive year, and a year of growth and positive exploration,” said Freeley.

Carter outlined how ASCD is accelerating its work to promote the needs of the whole child—which recasts the definition of a successful learner from one whose achievement is measured solely by academic tests to one who is knowledgeable, emotionally and physically healthy, civically engaged, prepared for economic self-sufficiency, and ready for the world beyond formal schooling.

Annual20meeting20232 As part of the multi-year, whole child initiative, ASCD convened the first meeting of the Commission on the Whole Child in January 2006. “This Commission of leading thinkers, researchers, and practitioners, from a wide variety of sectors, is looking at the competencies and habits of mind that young people need for healthy, productive lives,” said Carter. “We have challenged the Commission to make actionable recommendations that will take the report into the media, boardrooms, and legislatures for continued inquiry and, ultimately, transformative change.” He noted that the Commission will reconvene in July to set benchmarks for moving its work forward.

“The impact of our work will only be felt on a massive scale—and make a significant difference in the lives of learners—if, and only if, we make our voices heard,” said Carter. Accordingly, ASCD has been successfully mobilizing for advocacy and expanding opportunities for member influence. ASCD’s advocacy staff, Legislative Committee, and state/local teams have been working on pushing the issues with important implications for public education. Carter observed that affiliates have undertaken increasingly complex influence and advocacy roles both at the state/provincial and national/federal levels.

“The positions adopted by ASCD’s Leadership Council continue to guide our influence and advocacy work in four areas—the achievement gap, high-stakes testing, whole child, and health and learning,” said Carter.

The ASCD executive director called the past year a “record-breaker” for ASCD—with 175,000 members in 135 countries worldwide, 60 affiliates, and three new connected communities. He also reported that ASCD experienced the best financial year in Association history—continuing a trend seen four out of the past five fiscal years.

“The time is right for the ASCD Community to find the passion to go beyond where anyone before us has traveled,” Carter concluded. “Can we reach significance both in today’s world and in the legacy we leave for tomorrow’s children? I think we can.”

Posted by ASCD Bloggers on April 03, 2006 at 02:56 PM in Character Education, Collaborations and Partnerships, Core Curriculum Subjects, Current Affairs, Curriculum Instruction, Diversity in Education, Education Research, Professional Development, School Restructuring and Reform, Worldwide Issues | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

School Leadership Teams “the Engine of Change”

Jan Keating believes that well-managed leadership teams are key to ensuring that schools remain flexible enough to serve student needs. In her Conference session, “Transforming Your School through Shared Leadership,” she maintained that essential change cannot happen without a collaborative team of educators guiding the process.

A purposeful approach to building the team and guiding its work makes it effective.

“The leadership team is the engine of change in your school. Schools have to change all the time. A leadership team gives a school the capacity to adapt,” said the former biology teacher and principal who has worked in both Illinois and California. “Schools are like living organisms. If an organism cannot adapt to the changing environment, it will cease to exist. If allowed to change and adapt to fit its environment, the organism will evolve and flourish.”

Keating20231

Keating said the composition of leadership teams may vary from school to school. Generally the team members are teachers, although that’s not essential. She urged educators to avoid the easy route of simply appointing department heads. “The leadership team cannot be a political place,” she said.

Team members must share a commitment to ensuring that the best curricula are in place and that the best instruction is taking place in every classroom.

Keating said strong leadership teams can effectively tackle several critical tasks.

  • Driving instructional improvement. Teams are a forum for sharing best instructional practices and determining how to make them available to the entire faculty. Teams are also well suited for addressing grading issues and interpreting data that can be used to improve instruction.
  • Hiring and developing good teachers. Developing teacher recruitment strategies, establishing interview processes, setting up induction and mentoring programs, and directing professional development are all appropriate team tasks.
  • Setting and communicating policy. Keating views leadership teams as the prime mechanism for researching, debating, and deciding school policy matters. Team members are charged with gathering relevant information and viewpoints from their colleagues, and building buy-in among other teachers.

Keating urged educators to use rigorous processes for conducting team business and considers team participation a formal part of members’ job descriptions.

The results can be dramatic. At Pacific Collegiate School, a Santa Cruz, Calif., public charter secondary school where Keating served as principal until recently, a strong focus on team leadership led to significantly better AP exam participation and passage rates, higher SAT scores, lower student attrition, and greater enrollment. Collaboration works, she said.

“By setting up a shared leadership team, you are setting up a professional learning community,” Keating said. “Everyone is working toward the important goal of improving curriculum and instruction in the classroom.”

What's your experience with collaborative or team leadership? Does it work--or is it a lot of work with few results? Tell us about the team leadership barriers and benefits you have encountered -- just click on "Comments" below.


ASCD offers several important resources addressing teacher leadership, which is essential to effective shared leadership teams. Of particular note is Teacher Leadership That Strengthens Professional Practice, a new book by Charlotte Danielson that delivers practical strategies for helping teachers become effective leaders in their schools.


Posted by ASCD Bloggers on April 02, 2006 at 03:14 PM in Collaborations and Partnerships, Curriculum Instruction, Planning and Leadership, Professional Development, School Restructuring and Reform | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Education Data and the "Whole Child"

Chalkgirlsmall ASCD has announced the public release of the report, The Whole Child in a Fractured World by Harold "Bud" Hodgkinson. ASCD commissioned the paper for use by the Commission on the Whole Child, which held its inaugural meeting last month in Washington, D.C.

Convened by ASCD, the Commission is composed of a group of leading thinkers, researchers, and practitioners from a wide variety of sectors.

ASCD Executive Director Gene R. Carter noted that the Hodgkinson paper is designed to serve as a resource document for the Commission's work. The Commission is charged with recasting the definition of a successful learner from one whose achievement is measured solely by academic tests, to one who is knowledgeable, emotionally and physically healthy, civically engaged, prepared for economic self-sufficiency, and ready for the world beyond formal schooling.

The report documents the "splendid isolation of the U.S. educational system (or better yet … educational systems)," providing an overview of the complexity, the challenges, and the flaws in measuring efficacy. For example:

  • The U.S. Department of Education contributes only 10 percent of total education spending, but it issues 90 percent of the regulations that schools must follow.
  • Many dropouts actually "disappear" from the dropout rosters in the current high stakes high school testing environment.
  • The transience of U.S. students results in flawed assessments. According to the report, "the error can be 15 percent in states, and up to 50 percent in individual schools," using the primary testing unit for No Child Left Behind (NCLB).

Hodgkinson, director of the Center for Demographic Policy, Institute for Educational Leadership, proposes five themes for consideration.

  • Equity. Who gets access and who doesn't?
  • Coordination. Should there be one national standard for student proficiencies, set by the federal government, or a standard for each state? Who decides?
  • Knowledge Integration. How can we develop a common vocabulary for education discourse?
  • Sequence. In regards to learning and teaching, what should happen to people at what moment in their lives?
  • Wholeness.  Could schools collaborate with health, school, and community organizations in maximizing potential using a whole child approach?

"ASCD has convened the Commission on the Whole Child, because we believe that the success of each learner can only be achieved through a whole child approach to learning and teaching," said Carter. "Parents, teachers, and the community believe schools should focus on developing students who are academically proficient and physically and emotionally healthy and respectful, responsible, and caring."

"If decisions about education policy and practice started with 'What works for the child?' how would resources—time, space, and human—be arrayed to ensure each child's success?" said Carter. "If the student were truly at the center of the system, would could we achieve?"

Look for more information on the Commission and its work in coming months.

What's your view? How can schools nurture the whole child in an education environment that sometimes seems intent on squeezing out anything that doesn't contribute to the bottom line of test scores? Or does concern for the whole child go hand in hand with all manner of school-improvement efforts? Click on "Comments" below to tell us what you think.

Posted by ASCD Bloggers on March 17, 2006 at 12:22 PM in Current Affairs, Diversity in Education, Education Research, Planning and Leadership, School Restructuring and Reform, Worldwide Issues | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Dealing in Wholes, Not Percentages

Blogs and education news sites are buzzing about the so-called "65-percent solution"—legislation that plans to overhaul public school funding, and purports to give 65 cents of every school dollar directly to classroom needs.

That is, unless those needs involve: school librarians, guidance counselors, speech therapists, school nurses, teacher training, principals, school security, transportation, and child nutrition. These, and other vital services, aren't included in the 65-percent solution. (eSchool News)

Studies by nonpartisan groups show that the "solution" will do nothing to improve public education; yet, opinion polls show that between 70 percent and 80 percent of the U.S. public favors the measure. (Read more in the eSchool News editorial.)

Educators know that there's no such thing as a quick fix to satisfy all the needs of each child, and that's why ASCD stands firmly beside its Whole Child initiative--developing students who are healthy, knowledgeable, motivated, and engaged. We've recently posted a white paper—"The Whole Child in a Fractured World"—with background and reference materials that support ASCD's working Commission on the Whole Child. To find out more about the Whole Child initiative, go to our Web site, or if you're in Chicago, check out one of these conference sessions:

#1139 Slow Schools: Nurturing and Enriching the Intellect, Soul, and Spirit Saturday, April 1, 8:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. Presented by Gary Babiuk, University of Minnesota, Duluth.

#2142 Connecting the Dots: Linking School Health, Literacy, and Student Achievement Sunday, April 2, 8:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. Presented by Fred Peterson, University of Texas, Austin; Stephen Sroka, Case Western Reserve University, Lakewood, Ohio; Jacquelyn Sowers, Sowers Associates, Hampton, N.H.; Geri Coleman, Bremen Hich School, Midlothian, Ill.

#2261 Enhancing Student Motivation Sunday, April 2, 1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. Presented by Jonathen Erwin, Choice Consulting, Corning, N.Y.

# 3359 Sharpen Your Vision for What Schools Can Achieve--Why Do We Educate? (Distinguished Lecture) Monday, April 3, 1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. Presented by Nel Noddings.

Posted by Laura Varlas on March 15, 2006 at 03:30 PM in School Restructuring and Reform | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

The Stakes are High

High-stakes standardized tests can fill the brightest students with dread and frustrate the most dedicated educators. ASCD in 2004 issued a position statement calling high-stakes testing "an inappropriate use of assessment."

The problem: High-stakes testing often fails to adequately measure what students know and are able to do. Even the best standardized tests often return results too late for educators to adapt classroom practices in ways that would help students.

What do you think? This ASCD poll offers a chance for you to weigh in on the effect of high-stakes testing on your schools. We invite you tell us more about your experience with high-stakes tests.

Toward Meaningful Assessment

Understanding by Design expert Grant Wiggins recently had this to say about high-stakes testing: "I'm not saying let's get rid of testing. I'm saying that if the only feedback system you have about how you are doing ... is one test at the end of the year that you don't know the results of until summer, that's a dumb system." Wiggins and other argue for formative assessments--ongoing measures of how students perform against learning standards.

The ASCD Annual Conference offers many sessions on assessment. Here are a few that caught our eye:

Saturday, April 1
3:30-4:30 p.m.
Using Data to Guide Instruction and Improve Student Learning
4:45-5:45 p.m.
Making the Connection: When Assessment Informs Instruction, Everybody Wins!
5:15-6:15 p.m.
How Do We Meet the Challenge of Changing Federal Policy?

Sunday, April 2
8:00-9:00 a.m.
Data-Driven Decision Making: Integration of Curriculum Mapping and Assessment
8:00-9:00 a.m.
Authentic Learning: Performance-Based Assessment in Practice
8:00-9:30 a.m.
ASCD Learning and Assessment Network Forum

Monday, April 3
10:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m.
Constructing Assessment Practices to Challenge the Traditions of the Past
10:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m.
Technology Tools for Data-Driven Improvement
2:30-3:30 p.m.
Designing Formative Assessments to Measure Individual Students' Learning Trajectory

Posted by ASCD Bloggers on March 14, 2006 at 02:32 PM in Assessment and Evaluation, Current Affairs, School Restructuring and Reform | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)