I'm at the ED in '08 education blogging conference in D.C.--Roy Romer's gathering of ed bloggers--discussing what'll be the big ed agendas for the next president and Congress and the role blogs play in bringing ed issues to a broader audience.
In a room presumably full of education policy wonks and bloggers, it was interesting, in one of this morning's panel discussions, to hear the perspective of an actual teacher. Huffington Post contributor and author Dan Brown related his experience as a first-year teacher in a high-needs N.Y. elementary school and basically asked how we can disentangle high-stakes testing from accountability. Paraphrasing his remarks,
The testing environment is terrifying, and my students' scores did not reflect their ability. High-stakes testing and accountability have been conflated. Is there research and development looking at alternatives beyond the high-stakes test?
Ed Trust's Amy Wilkins responded bluntly, "Why were you in that high-needs classroom?"--Implying that inexperienced first-year teachers shouldn't be working with challenging student populations
Was Wilkins just dodging Brown's question or refocusing the debate on a root cause of test anxiety (new teachers in over their heads)? And does this beg the question, if passionate teachers like Brown aren't in these high-needs classrooms, who will be? I think it's no coincidence that incentive pay has crept into the conference conversation all morning . . .
Recent Comments